Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Shipman

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 15, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application for determination of value of legal services.

1Opinion of the Court

Cohalan, S.

This is an application by an attorney for a determination of the value of his services rendered to the estate and for an order directing payment therefor out of the funds of the estate. I have decided to adopt the opinion and findings of the referee and add this memorandum because of the doubt as to the jurisdiction of the surrogate to entertain the proceeding resulting from the decision of the Appellate Division in Matter of Connell, 196 App. Div. 639.

This kind of proceeding was first suggested by the Appellate Division, second department, in Matter of Rabell, 175 App. Div. 345.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jessup v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. In re RabellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  3. In re O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of the Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. In Re Estate of MathesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. In re the Estate of ParsonsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923
  4. In re the Estate of HeilbronnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1963
  5. In Re the Estate of ProctorNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API