Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Heilbronner

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 10, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The attorney for three of the residuary legatees petitions the court for fixation of his compensation. As set forth in the citation he requests the court to fix his compensation ‘ ‘ for services rendered to the estate of the decedent ”. The petition is vague in respect of the source of the payment, but the citation and the entire argument make it clear that he is seeking payment from the estate generally and not payment from the shares of his respective clients. The services for which he requests compensation were rendered in a proceeding to compel the executor to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of MathesonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of VorndranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
  3. In re the Estate of WinburnNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  4. In re the Estate of SielckenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  5. In re the Estate of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BetilloNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In re the Estate of PovlsenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
  3. In re the Accounting of MarracinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API