Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Kelly

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1874PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Livingston Circuit.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This was an action upon a promissory note given by defendant to Ira V. Reeves, a son of the plaintiff. The defendant did not deny the execution of the note, but gave notice of defense that the note was given -for the purchase price of land which Ira V. Reeves falsely and fraudulently represented'he was owner of, but to which he had no title whatever.

On the trial the defendant was permitted to show that his bargaining for the land was with the plaintiff, to whom Ira V. Reeves had sent him with the statement that he could make a bargain with his father, and whatever bargain they should make, he…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marx v. KingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  2. A. G. Danforth & Co. v. CrookshanksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Garey v. Kelvinator Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Moynes v. ApplebaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Blass v. . TerryNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API