Legal Opinion

People v. Etoll

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1980PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

*841The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

At trial, two notebooks containing prostitution records were admitted into evidence against defendant. On this appeal defendant contends that these notebooks, which were seized by a police officer who was lawfully in her apartment for the purpose of executing an arrest warrant, should not have been admitted into evidence under the "plain view” doctrine because the incriminatory nature of this evidence was not "immediately apparent”. (See Coolidge v New Hampshire, 403 US 443, 466.) While we agree with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. PersenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. People v. RivasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. People v. RegnetNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. ClementeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API