Legal Opinion

Ault v. O'Brien

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1939No. 9027PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kenna, Judge:

This original proceeding in mandamus was brought for the purpose of requiring the Honorable J. J. P. O’Brien, Judge of the Circuit Court of Ohio County, to settle a bill of exceptions prepared in narrative form and not including a typewritten transcript of any part of the testimony taken in an action for personal injury, which was instituted by the petitioner against L. S. Good & Company and resulted in a verdict for the defendant. The defendant company filed written objections to the signing of the bill, the trial judge declined to certify and rejected a tendered order reciting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Poteet v. County CommissionersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Plate v. DurstWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Cummings v. ArmstrongWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. King v. JordanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bailey Lumber Co. v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. New Bay Shore Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
  3. Village of Bridgeport v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Carter v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Carter v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API