Legal Opinion

Faucett v. Faucett

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 22, 1866PublishedCited by 8 opinions

CASE 116 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL PROM TAYLOR CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Peters

Robert Faucett devised the principal part of his estate, consisting of land and slaves, to his wife, “ during her natural life or widowhood,” and directed, at her death or marriage, that his land, slaves, and personalty should be sold by his executor, and gave specific directions how the proceeds should be divided amongst and held by his children. The slaves he directed to be sold to his children only.

He appointed his son, William Faucett, his sole executor, who qualified and took upon himself the execution of the will.

*512In September, 1862, after the death of the widow, the land, slaves, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mitchum's Heirs v. Mitchum's AdministratorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1835

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Scholle v. . ScholleNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Clay v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  3. Petrey's Adm'r v. PetreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. First State Bank of Pineville v. CatronCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. Harris v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API