Legal Opinion

State v. Meyer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 7, 1980No. 3784-IIPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, C.J.

—Robert F. Meyer was convicted for theft in the second degree for having obtained property by writing a number of checks without sufficient funds to cover them. The principal issue is whether the State could properly aggregate the checks—none of which exceeded $250 in value—to obtain a conviction for second-degree theft under RCW 9A.56.040, which requires theft of property or services in excess of $250. A related issue is whether the State should have relied upon the general theft statute at all, rather than the more specific statute prohibiting issuance of bad checks, RCW 9A.56.060. A third…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Loper v. BetoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. State v. WickeWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. FainWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. WallachMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State v. ScobyWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AttertonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. GagnonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API