Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Allen

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 2001No. 2000-KA-0346Published

1Concurrence

pPLOTKIN, J.,

concurring.

I write separately on the hearsay issues because of the general misuse and misunderstanding of the “fruits of the investigation” exception.

ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NO. 2, 6, and 9

Defendant claims that the trial court committed multiple continuous legal errors throughout the trial regarding hearsay. Specifically, the trial judge overruled the defendant’s objections, during opening statement, trial and closing argument when it allowed the prosecutor and the police officers to tell the jury hearsay statements made by the defendant’s wife, Traleya Smith, and his mother in law,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. State v. HearoldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  4. State v. CaseySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
  5. State v. WilleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API