Legal Opinion

City of Henderson v. County of Vance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

It will -be noted that the court below, upon the facts found, held -a© -a matter of law “That the County of Vance should p-ay into the hands o-f the Clerk of the Vanice County Recorder’s Court one-half of his fees as well -as one-half of the fees of the Constables, Justices -of the Peace and Witnesses in ¡all ¡state failures.” However, the judgment entered below is to the effect that the County of Vance is and ha© been liable -since the enactment of tire Session Law© of 1949, Chapter 409, to p-ay into the hands of the Ol-erk -of the Vance County Roe-order’© Court one-half of the lawful fees…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. City of Greensboro v. County of GuilfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dickerson Carolina, Inc. v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Kirkman v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Dickerson Carolina, Inc. v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Kirkman v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API