Legal Opinion

Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 24, 1986No. 16-3003PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

Kramer VI has arrived faster than we thought possible. The previous opinion in this sequence concluded that the Parole Commission was entitled to rely on a deficiency notice issued by the IRS in determining — for purposes of evaluating the severity of Kramer’s offense — that Kramer evaded more than $300,000 in taxes. Kramer v. Jenkins, 803 F.2d 896 (7th Cir.1986) (Kramer F). We held that the opportunity to argue before the IRS supplied Kramer with the process that was due him.

Kramer’s petition for rehearing insists that the IRS issued its notice without offering him an opportunity to provide…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olim v. WakinekonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Shango v. JurichCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  4. Randall F. Carson and Susan Carson v. John R. Block, Individually and as Former Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Arnold I. Kramer v. O.C. Jenkins, Warden, and United States Parole Commission, RespondentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Phillip D. Scott v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  2. United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Daniel J. Waletzki v. P.W. Keohane, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Kent Evans v. United States Parole Commission, Jay Van Russell v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. FriedlandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API