People v. Phair
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAHN, J., pro tem.
Defendant was found guilty on each of four counts charging him with the offense of contributing to delinquency, declared to be a misdemeanor under the “Juvenile Court Law’’. The judgment of the court was that he be punished by imprisonment in the Los Angeles county jail for a period of two years on each count. Sentences on three counts were to run concurrently, and on the fourth, to run consecutively with the sentences on the other counts.
In his appeal from the judgment 'defendant urges that this judgment of imprisonment is contrary to law for the reason that the provisions…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bateman v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Matter of Petition of JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lambert v. ConradCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re ChiapettoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. ClarkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- In Re BuchananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.