Legal Opinion
Aurora Shores Homeowners Assn. v. Hardy
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1987No. 12813PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMahoney, J.
Plaintiff-appellant, Aurora Shores Homeowners Association (“Aurora Shores”) appeals a declaratory judgment denying it the right to demand that defendants Harry and Mary Hardy remove a chain-link dog run on their premises for noncompliance with allotment covenants and restrictions. We affirm.
The Hardys live within Aurora Shores, a planned urban development. Section 1, Article X of the “Covenants and Restrictions for Aurora Shores” provides as follows:
“ARTICLE X
“ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE
“Section 1. Review by Committee. No building, docks, fence, wall or other structure shall be commenced,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leake v. Campbell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Woodcreek Assn., Inc. v. BingleOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Scott R. Leake and Susan E. Leake, Individually and on Behalf of the Architectural Control Committee of the Sunny Meadows Addition v. Therman M. Campbell, Jr. and Susan M. Campbell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011
- Scott R. Leake and Susan E. Leake, Individually and on Behalf of the Architectural Control Committee of the Sunny Meadows Addition v. Therman M. Campbell, Jr. and Susan M. Campbell, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011