In re Steven L.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant failed to preserve for appellate review his *614contention regarding the legal sufficiency of the evidence (see Matter of Trayvond W., 71 AD3d 683 [2010]; Matter of Omar G., 38 AD3d 549 [2007]; cf. CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Finger, 95 NY2d 894 [2000]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792 [1987]; cf. People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Gabriel C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Friday M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re William A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Mercedes K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- In re Racheal M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.