Legal Opinion

In re Gabriel C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 13, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant challenges the Family Court’s finding that she committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the third degree. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]; cf. People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of attempted assault in the third degree (see Penal Law §§…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Nijuel J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  2. In re Jalen G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. In re Jalen G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. In re Jonathan M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. In re Jonathan M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API