Legal Opinion

Kal Kan Foods, Inc. v. Iams Co.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 25, 2002No. C-3-01-83PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(1) (DOC. # 16-1) AND THEIR MOTION, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 16-2); PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL (DOC. #33) SUSTAINED; PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (DOC. #33) OVERRULED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEWAL AT THE COMPLETION OF THIS LITIGATION; DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO STRIKE (DOC. # 40, DOC. # 53, DOC. # 60) OVERRULED AS MOOT; CONFERENCE CALL SET

RICE, Chief Judge.

The instant litigation arises out of alleged false advertising by the lams Company (“lams”) for its dog food products.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Victory Global, LLC v. Fresh Bourbon, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API