Legal Opinion

Eida v. Stoddard

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 5, 1971No. 6174PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.

In this bill in equity, the trial court entered a decree, assented to by counsel, establishing the boundary line between the property of these parties and decreeing certain rights of the parties with respect thereto. Defendant’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Flynn, J.

The parties are owners of certain property in Hollis in this State which is separated by a common boundary, the Nissitissit River, a nonnavigable stream about thirty feet wide at this location. The Eida property is southerly of the river. In 1963 Stoddard started two actions against Eida. One was a bill in equity…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beliveau v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  2. Burtman v. ButmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  3. Town of Alton v. Town of GilmantonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1823
  4. Barry v. BartisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  5. Couillard v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Koval v. SIMON TELELECT. INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Laurel Bank and Trust Co. v. BurnsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  3. Paras v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
  4. In re Estate of KellySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. Norberg v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API