Leishman v. Union Iron Works
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
Plaintiff was a journeyman molder in the service of defendant. While assisting in casting an iron piston-ring, he was seriously injured by the explosion of the mold in which the ring was being cast, and brought this action to recover damages for the injuries sustained. The case was tried before a jury, and at the close of the evidence the trial court granted a motion made by the defendant for a nonsuit. Judgment was entered accordingly in favor of defendant, and this appeal is taken from the judgment and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. The only question involved on…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Donovan v. FerrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Congrave v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Quinn v. Electric Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Manning v. App Consol. Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Henson v. Pascola Stave Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1910
- Hayes v. Western Fuel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Bort v. QuadtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.