Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Central Pac. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of California

Decided August 20, 1877PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Demurrer [by Daniel W. Vaughan] to bill in equity.

1Opinion of the Court

SAWYER, Circuit Judge.

This is a bill in equity seeking an account and recovery of the gains and profits resulting to the defendant from the use of an “improvement in the mode of operating brakes for cars, or railway carriages,” patented by the plaintiff’s assignor, whose patent defendant is alleged to have infringed. The term of the extended patent expired October 4, 1870, and the infringement complained of occurred before that date.

The defendant demurs to the bill on the ground, mainly, that, upon the facts alleged, the complainant has a plain, adequate and complete remedy at law, and,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burdell v. DenigSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Brown v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Seymour v. SeymourNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
  4. Gelston v. HoytNew York Court of Chancery · 1815

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Atwood v. The Portland Co.United States Circuit Court · 1880
  2. Brick v. Staten Island Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  3. Owyhee Land & Irrigation Co. v. TautphausCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API