Burdell v. Denig
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller
The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the Circuit Court in an action for an infringement of the patent of A. B. Wilson, for a feeding device in sewing-machines. They recovered a judgment for one hundred and twenty-five dollars, but insist that they were entitled to a much larger judgment, of which they were deprived by the rulings of the court in the progress of the trial.
The objections to these rulings will be considered by us under three heads, to which all the assignments of error relate.
1. As to the measure of damages.
Evidence was given tending to prove that plaintiffs had advertised…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Packet Co. v. SicklesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
3Cited by34 opinions
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Liu v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Birdsall v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States Frumentum Co. v. LauhoffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.