Legal Opinion
People v. Andrino
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 26, 1989No. F009926PublishedCited by 2 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, Acting P. J.
Pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5, subdivision (m), defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction following a negotiated guilty plea, challenging the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.
Statement of the Case
On June 9, 1987, a 63-count information was filed in the Stanislaus County Superior Court charging defendant Robert J. Andrino and one Kenneth Dekelaita with various gambling and bookmaking offenses. Defendant was charged with one count of maintaining a place for bookmaking in violation of Penal Code 1 section 337a, subdivision…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Patrick Henry Patterson, United States of America v. Walter William LaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ThussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- People v. GuajardoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994