Legal Opinion
People v. Thuss
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 2003No. C040272PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Following the denial of his motion to traverse a search warrant and suppress evidence, defendant Joshua James Thuss pled no contest to possession of marijuana for sale in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11359. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) he was denied due process when the trial court refused to admit certain evidence relevant to the affiant’s credibility at the traversal hearing (Franks v. Delaware (1978) 438 U.S. 154 [98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667] (Franks)) and (2) there was insufficient probable cause to support the search warrant for his residence.
We…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- (HC)Patterson v. BurtonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- P. v. Pulliam CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. HayesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- People v. Keigwin CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.