Frazier v. Steenrod
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from the Des Moines District Court. Tbis action was brought to recover certain land in Des Moines county, which was sold by the guardian of the plaintiff, under a license obtained therefor, in the year 1849. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court, in connection with the questions raised for determination. The judgment of the district court was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWoodward, J.
The questions made in the cause, do not call for much discussion of the rules and principles heretofore considered in the cases of Cooper v. Sunderland, 3 Io*341wa, 113, and Morrow v. Weed, 4 Ib., 77. The points maybe presented with brevity.
The first and second errors assigned, are to the refusal to admit in evidence certain papers offered by the defend, ant, and the third is to the admission of certain ones offered by the plaintiff.
■ The defendant claimed under a guardian’s sale, and to make his case, brought into court, (as the bill of exceptions shows), the files constituting the record in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morrow v. WeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pursley v. HayesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Conner v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Lyon v. VanattaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Mannix v. Portland TelegramOregon Supreme Court · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.