Legal Opinion

Baylees v. Reed

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 16, 1920No. Civ. No. 3186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. S. M. Marsh, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

By this action plaintiff seeks to recover $2,354.92 from the defendants, executors of the estate of Edwin Ferris, deceased, for work, labor, and services performed and supplies furnished to said Ferris, at his special instance.

The answer of defendants to plaintiff’s third amended complaint, after admitting formal parts only, denied each and every material allegation thereof, and set up an alleged agreement under and by virtue of which plaintiff performed the work and furnished the materials, etc., for which he now seeks pay, asserting that said decedent, Ferris, had paid plaintiff in full for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Porter v. . DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Cullen v. BisbeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Parker v. WellsNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Hiskett v. BozarthNebraska Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Todd v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hays v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API