Legal Opinion
Sorrell v. Micomonaco
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 24, 2017No. CA2016–07–060PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtM. Powell, J.
*26 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, AAM Properties, LLC ("AAM"), appeals from a judgment of the Warren County Court of Common Pleas finding that lis pendens applied to AAM's acquisition of certain real property, and ordering that the conveyance of the property to AAM be rescinded and that the prior owner specifically perform a contract to convey the property to plaintiff-appellee, Charles Sorrell ("Sorrell").
{¶ 2} The Micomonaco family has owned three adjoining parcels of real property for more than 40 years. During many of those years, Fred Micomonaco and Justin…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cook v. MozerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- Katz v. BanningOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Desantis v. SollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- City of Cincinnati Ex Rel. Ritter v. Cincinnati Reds, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kand Medical, Inc. v. Freund Medical Products, Inc., Mansfield Scientific, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Trammell v. BronerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Fry v. SpeelmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Old Republic Surety Company v. T&A Construction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Orange Barrel Media, LLC v. KR Sunset WeHo, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Peter Gakuba v. California Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2023