Legal Opinion

Fry v. Speelman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2019No. 18AP0012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Fry v. Speelman,

2019-Ohio-585.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) JAMES R. FRY, et al. C.A. No. 18AP0012 Appellees/Cross-Appellants v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE GRACE A. SPEELMAN COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF WAYNE, OHIO Appellant/Cross-Appellee CASE No. 2014 CVC-H 000512 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: February 19, 2019 HENSAL, Judge. {¶1} Grace A. Speelman appeals from the judgment of the Wayne County Court of Common Pleas that granted James and Dianne Fry’s renewed motion for summary judgment. The Frys filed a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Warthog Mgt., L.L.C. v. FaresOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  2. Leotta v. Great Lakes Pain Mgt. Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API