Legal Opinion

Scarborough v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 12, 1934No. 2573PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Chief Justice.

In this case on a bill of review, the trial court set aside a judgment by default in favor of appellant, W. M. . Scarborough, against B. B. Kerr as principal, and L. D. Guinn and L. H. Jones as sureties, on a re-plevin bond in a garnishment case; and by the final judgment released the principal and sureties from all liability on the bond. The issue made by the bill of review against the judgment by default and found by the court in support of the judgment appealed from was that the fund replevined was not subject to garnishment. The appeal is prosecuted only against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wandelohr v. Grayson County National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Garrett v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. Wills v. TyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Great American Insurance Co. v. North Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API