Legal Opinion

Kingman-Texas Implement Co. v. Herring Nat. Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1913Published

Appeal from District Court, Wilbarger County; S. P. Huff, Judge. Action by the Kingman-Texas Implement Company against the Herring National Bank, as garnishee, and others. From a judgment against plaintiff as to the money sought to be garnisheed, it appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Special Judge.

On June 2, 1910, the appellant, Kingman-Texas Implement Company, recovered a judgment in one of the district courts of Dallas county against A. D. Davis and E. P. Hutchens, individually, and as a firm of Davis & Hutch-ens, for the sum of $4,399.32; and on August 4, 1910, appellant sued out a writ of garnishment against the Herring National Bank of Vernon, Wilbarger county, requiring it to answer as to its indebtedness, etc., to the defendant in the judgment, A. D. Davis. The garnishee bank answered on November 14, 1910, and the answer returned to the Dallas district…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blum v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Winston v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Evans v. PurintonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. Vickers v. CarnahanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  5. First National Bank v. McGuireSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API