Legal Opinion

Evans v. Purinton

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1896No. 2019PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TARLTON, Chief Justice.

—

The parties to this appeal are Sam Evans, appellant, plaintiff in the court below, and W. W. Purinton (husband of M. M. Purinton, deceased), Mattie E. Purinton, Arthur B. Purinton, Annie E. Bomar, and Mattie E. Broad, children and heirs at law of M. M. Purinton, deceased, Annie E. Bomar and Mattie E. Broad being joined respectively by their husbands D. T. Bomar and John W. Broad.

The suit, filed October 25, 1888, is an action of trespass to try title, involving certain lands lying in Wichita County, Texas.

In 1877 W. W. Purinton became insolvent, and has since so…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. de Garca v. GalvanTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. McCutchen v. PurintonTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Ullmann, Lewis & Co. v. JasperTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. De Blane v. Hugh Lynch & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LeonardTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hodge v. EllisTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Stephens v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Armstrong v. TurbevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Turbeville v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API