Legal Opinion

Bemidji Sales Barn, Inc. v. Chatfield

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 21, 1977No. 46655PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Defendant, Gilbert Chatfield, purchased breeding heifers from plaintiff, Bemidji Sales Barn, Inc., at auction. Upon defendant’s refusal to make good his check for payment or to return the cattle, plaintiff sued defendant for the purchase price. Defendant counterclaimed, alleging damages resulting from a breach of an express warranty by plaintiff that the cattle were properly vaccinated for shipping fever and breach of an implied war ranty of merchantability. The trial judge, sitting without a jury by agreement of the parties, found a breach of the express warranty alleged…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. W & W Livestock Enterprises, Inc. v. DennlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  2. Lanesboro Produce & Hatchery Co. v. ForthunSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Appliances, Inc. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  4. Casper v. FrederickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Federal Signal Corp. v. Safety Factors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  5. Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API