Legal Opinion

McCray v. Koop

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 4, 2025No. 1:16-cv-00694Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICARDO McCRAY, Petitioner, 16-CV-694-LJV-HKS v. DECISION & ORDER MARLYN KOOP, Superintendent of the Sing Sing Correctional Facility, Respondent. Before the Court is a motion to amend filed by the pro se petitioner, Ricardo McCray. Docket Item 23. For the reasons that follow, this Court denies McCray’s motion. DISCUSSION When a petitioner seeks to amend his habeas petition under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

to add a new claim for which “the statute of limitations has run,” the new claim must “relate back” to the claims in the original petition.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mayle v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Victor Zarvela v. Christopher Artuz, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. Laurey v. GrahamDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API