Legal Opinion

State v. Prater

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1922PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.

This is a proceeding of mandamus involving the office of Commissioner of University and School Lands. The trial court found that the relator was entitled to the office. The defendant has appealed from the order.

The facts are not disputed. They are as follows: The defendant was appointed Commissioner on September 1, 1921, for a period of two years. He qualified and took office. On April 8, 1922, the board by resolution removed the defendant, declared the office vacant, and thereafter appointed the relator to fill the same. No charges were preferred; no notice thereof served. The board assumed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States v. RyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. State ex rel. Wehe v. FrazierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  5. People Ex Rel. Brown v. WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1865

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Collison v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BroderickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Higginbottom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. People v. ShawyerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Chester v. EinarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API