Legal Opinion

Poole v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 4, 2001No. A01A0819Published

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Anthony Nathaniel Poole, Jr. guilty of armed robbery.1 In his sole enumeration of error, Poole contends that the trial court erred in failing to give a charge on the alternate crime of theft by receiving stolen property as a lesser included offense of armed robbery. Theft by receiving stolen property,2 as a matter of law, is not a lesser included offense of armed robbery.3

Poole acknowledges the Young decision but argues that we should not apply it to the facts of this case, as that would effectively deprive him of the defense that he was not guilty of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  2. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Hemphill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  4. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API