People v. Pritchett
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the prosecutor violated Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling and that his motion for a mistrial therefore should have been granted. We disagree. The cross-examination of defendant concerning the statement he gave to the police before he was convicted in 1992 did not violate the court’s Sandoval ruling, and the prosecutor did not question defendant concerning the underlying facts of that conviction. In any event, even assuming, arguendo, that the prosecutor violated the Sandoval ruling in that respect, defendant was not thereby…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. DawsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. FiedorczykAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. DelcarpioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. CarneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. AlshoaibiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. WalkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. BentonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Walker v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- People v. BarlowAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.