Swift v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentHall, Presiding Judge
The apparent philosophy behind the position taken by the majority opinion will constitute a severe limitation on law enforcement in Georgia. The actual decision restricts the use of the roadblock—a very valuable police tool in protecting the members of the public upon the highways of this state. But the underlying approach is even more far-reaching, and foreshadows the intention of this court to sit as a trial court when as many as five of our nine judges hold notions about law enforcement techniques which conflict with the lawful procedures of properly constituted law enforcement officers.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ginn v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.