Legal Opinion
Beavers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 2, 1925No. 4169PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonahue, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The motion for a directed verdict was properly overruled, for the reason that the government offered substantial evidence tending to prove each and every material allegation of the indictment. This court has no authority to determine the- weight of the evidence.
It is insisted, however, that there is a fatal variance between the allegations of the indictment and the evidence, in that the indictment charges that this interstate freight was shipped by Duke & Co. from .Durham, N. C., and the evidence offered in support of this allegation relates to shipments…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Putnam v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bennett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Sneed v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1924
- Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. WoelfleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- Continental Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
- Ercoli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- King v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928
- United States v. MaggioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.