Legal Opinion
Sellman v. Schaaf
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 29, 1969No. 1063PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCole, J.
This ease comes before the court upon a motion to dismiss an appeal taken on questions of law and fact.
The facts alleged in the pleadings and as set forth in the transcript of testimony indicate that in 1944 Harry E. Johnson and John P. Schooley dedicated a certain subdivision of part of Seminole Island in Indian Lake, Logan County, Ohio, known as Seminole Shores Subdivision No. 2. Some one hundred and sixteen lots were included in the subdivision, the plat being duly recorded. Among the lots were lots Nos. 85 and 86, both with shore line frontage, lot 85 being adjacent to and north of lot 86…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Shuster v. North American Mortgage Loan Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- City of Euclid v. VogelinOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Johnston v. DeatonOhio Supreme Court · 1922
- Lewis v. HickokOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- American Mall, Inc. v. City of LimaOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ohio Historical Society v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Sellman v. SchaafOhio Court of Appeals · 1971
- Pewter Mug, Inc. v. M. U. G. Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Daneman v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (In Re Hoff)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995
- Simandl v. SchimandleOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.