Legal Opinion

Johnston v. Deaton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1922No. 17182PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

Epitomized Opinion

The plaintiff began action to partition of two 80 acre tracts of land between herself and defendant. The commissioners reported against division, and appraised each tract separately. The Common Pleas overruled plaintiff’s objection to the rule of the commissioners, and ordered the premises sold. The Court of Appeals held “no appeal lies from the order under consideration.” The Supreme Court held:

1. That it has recently decided, in 104 OS., 188, that the term “judgment” appearing in Sec. 6, Art. IV, Ohio Const., as amended in 1912, is no longer limited to the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. CrainOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Hersch v. Home Sav & Loan Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Sellman v. SchaafOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Hack v. KellerOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Malone v. MaloneOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API