Finucane v. Interior Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (George Friedman, J.), entered April 27, 1998, which denied third-party plaintiff Wiltel Communications Systems’ motion for summary judgment declaring third-party defendant contractually obligated to defend and indemnify it in an underlying action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion granted.
The origin of this appeal lies in a contract between Baker & McKenzie, a large national law firm, and Wiltel Communica*619tions Systems, Inc. (Wiltel), a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Oklahoma. The contract provided…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Cooney v. Osgood Machinery, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- A. S. Rampell, Inc. v. Hyster Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Schmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Koob v. IDS Financial Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, U.S., L.L.C. v. John NackelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Rje Corp. v. Northville Industries Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Chesapeake Operating, Inc. v. Nabors Drilling USA, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
- Madden v. Midland Funding, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Frankel v. Citicorp Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.