Legal Opinion

Atlas Distilling Co. v. Rheinstrom

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 16, 1898No. 469PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to the'Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern Division of the Northern District of Illinois.

1Opinion of the Court

WOODS, Circuit Judge.

The defendants in error sued the Atlas Distilling Company in assumpsit. Trial by jury was waived by stipulation in writing, and the court, upon a general finding, gave judgment in the sum of $2,330.25 in favor of the plaintiffs. The plaintiff in error urges only the first and fifth specifications of error, which are to the effect, first, that the court erred in admitting in evidence a certified copy of Form 52 A and B, furnished by the internal revenue collector, "as set forth in bill of exceptions,” and, fifth, that the court erred in overruling the motion for new trial…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Coquard v. Indian Grave Drainage Dist.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
  2. Sladden v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lahman v. Burnes Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. New Orleans & N. E. R. v. ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
  3. The DevonianDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API