Legal Opinion

Union Bank & Trust Co. v. Rice

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 23, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Cammack

Reversing.

The appellant, Union Bank & Trust Company, is appealing from a judgment wherein it was adjudged that the appellee, Cordelia M. Rice, is the owner of the equitable and legal title in a certain oil royalty. The appellant brought two suits against the appellees, E. E. Rice and Cordelia M. Rice, his wife, in 1934, in which it sought to foreclose on certain property which had been mortgaged by the appellees to it, and also to collect certain debts which were owing to it by E. E. Rice personally. Attachments were sued out in each case. An attachment was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holliday v. HollidayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Reed v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Madden v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Richardson v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  2. Knight v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Bank of Clarkson v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  4. Howser v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API