Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Holliday

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided April 28, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner—

Affirming.

In this case the trial court adjudged that the appellee, Larkin Holliday, was an equal partner with the .appellant, Belle Holliday, in a mercantile business and the joint owner of certain real estate, title to all of which property has been held in the appellant’s name. The decision involves primarily questions of fact.

We state the evidence submitted by the plaintiff .upon which he has successfully maintained his claims. Prior to October, 1925, the appellant’s husband, Sherman Holliday and his brother, Chester, had conducted a store at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harrel's Administrator v. HarrelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Foushee v. FousheeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Anglo-American Mill Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  5. Chappell v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arrington v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  2. Gottsegen v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  3. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  4. Forsyth v. WellmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  5. Sewell v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API