Legal Opinion

Tempo Tamers, Inc. v. Crow-Houston Four, Ltd.

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided May 5, 1986No. 05-84-00972-CVPublished

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Appellants complain that we failed to address a contention raised in their first point of error, which stated that the “trial court erred in dismissing the cause of action against appellee Crow for misrepresentation of fact and failing to submit issues to the jury with regard to such action.” We found no ruling in the record indicating that the trial court dismissed appellants’ action for fraud, and therefore interpreted the point as complaining of the failure to submit special issues on that ground of recovery. Appellants insist on rehearing that this point complained…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Susanoil, Inc. v. Continental Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Richman Trusts v. KutnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. American Marine Upholstery Co. v. MinskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API