Baumgartl v. Hoyne
Appellate Court of Illinois
Memorandum.—Assumpsit for commissions. -Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Thomas G. Windes, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Waterman
Appellants wholly failed to show that they were the procuring cause of the sale to Mr. Eosenberg. Appellees did not sell the property to the syndicate to which Mr. Eosenberg turned the property over. The dealings of appellees in the matter of the final sale of the property were with Hr. Eosenberg and with nobody else.
Appellants themselves never made any effort to sell to Mr. Eosenberg, and had no communication directly or indirectly with him. The nearest appellants came to having induced Mr. Eosenberg to become the purchaser, is that they did have negotiations with several gentlemen for the…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Ritch v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Miller Cattle Co. v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1930
- Bowers v. MillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910
- Rawlings v. WaddillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921