Legal Opinion
Rickard v. Ohio Department of Liquor Control
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 27, 1985No. 85-CA-18PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrogan, P.J.
Prior to the fall 1983 general election in Greene County, Ohio, petitions were properly and timely filed with the Greene County Board of Elections for a local option election involving the sale of alcoholic beverages in adjoining precincts CLB and CFA in Xenia, Ohio. At that time, precinct CLB was “dry” for liquor sales and precinct CFA was “wet.” As mandated by statute, the only way for precinct CLB to become “wet” was for it to combine with an adjoining precinct and let the voters of these precincts determine what status they wished their precincts to continue to enjoy.
No protests were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rickard v. Ohio Department of Liquor ControlOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Penn Traffic Co. v. Clark County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1999