Legal Opinion
(PC) Bland v. Moffett
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 16, 2021No. 1:19-cv-01750Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01750-NONE-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 13 v. PARTIALLY DISMISS COMPLAINT 14 D. MOFFETT, et al., (Doc. 20) 15 Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth 19 Amendment failure-to-protect claims against Defendants Jaime and Stark and on a single First 20…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.