Fedtro, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Bichardson, Judge:
The protest herein involves merchandise described on the invoice as a “4-Way Flasher Switch for Automobile,” which was assessed with duty at the rate of TT% per centum ad valorem under the provision in item 685.90 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) for electrical switches, or other electrical apparatus for *324making or breaking electrical circuits, or for making connections to or in electrical circuits.
The plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 8^2 per centum ad valorem under item 685.70, TSUS, as visual electrical signalling…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Astra Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Robert Bosch Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- S. Hiller & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.