Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Park Commission
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice
¶1 The Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks Commission (FWP) appeals from the order of the Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County, awarding attorney’s fees and costs to Plaintiffs, Citizens for Balanced Use, et al., (collectively, Plaintiffs or CBU) on their claims against FWP for violating their rights to know and participate under Sections 8 and 9, Article II, of the Montana Constitution. We affirm and restate the issue as follows:
¶2 Did the District Court err by awarding attorney’s fees and costs to CBU for prevailing on its constitutional claims?
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶3 FWP is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
- Havre Daily News, LLC v. City of HavreMontana Supreme Court · 2006
- Bryan v. Yellowstone County Elementary School District No. 2Montana Supreme Court · 2002
- Schoof v. NesbitMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Mungas v. Great Falls Clinic, LLPMontana Supreme Court · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- MC, Inc. v. Cascade City-County Board of HealthMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Heringer v. BarnegatMontana Supreme Court · 2021
- Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Park CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- Montanore Minerals Corporation v. Easements and Rights of Way under, through and across those certain unpatented lode mining claims located in the NE 1/4 and the NW 1/4 of Section 15, Township 27 North, Range 31 West, Lincoln County, MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2020
- Moonrise Partners, LLC v. Town of West YellowstoneDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.