Crawford v. Horton

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill was to perfect . and enforce the statutory right of redemption of lands subject to mortgage.

The question presented is: Did the lower court commit reversible error in the rendition of decrees pursuant to the decision on pleading in this case [Crawford et al. v, Horton et al., 234 Ala. 439, 175 So. 310], where the respective propositions of law were decided. We find no cause to recede from the decisions there made.

The several rules governing redemption are well understood. Crawford v. Horton, supra; Dewberry et al. v. Bank of Standing Rock et al., 227 Ala. 484, 150 So.…