Legal Opinion

Meenen v. Meenen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1957No. 40,406PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is the second appearance of this action in this court (See Meenen v. Meenen, 178 Kan. 510, 289 P. 2d 766). The appeal is from a judgment denying petitioner’s claim relative to an accounting in his second cause of action, and from all other adverse rulings.

It goes without saying that the issues now to be reviewed ■ are dependent upon later events and proceedings. Nevertheless, since this cause was determined by the court below on an agreed statement of facts in substantial accord with tire facts stated by the answer of the defendants,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Osborn v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Leslie v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Riley v. DaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. Head v. SpierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Fletcher v. WormingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jackson Trak Group, Inc. Ex Rel. Jackson Jordan, Inc. v. Mid States Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  2. Phelps Dodge Copper Products Corp. v. Alpha Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  3. Marshall Long and Betty C. Long v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
  4. Matter of the Estate of ColacciColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. McGowen v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API