Legal Opinion

Princess Hotels International v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1984No. 120PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Where a civil litigant decides to change lawyers and moves for a continuance four days prior to a scheduled, non-jury trial, is it an abuse of discretion to deny his request and require that trial take place as scheduled? We conclude under the circumstances of this case that it was not.

Dennis E. Hamilton, trading as Hamilton Holidays, contracted with Princess Hotels International to lease ninety hotel rooms at the Bahamas Princess on the nights of April 13, 14 and 15, 1979. The total contract price of $14,266.80 was payable as follows:

Deposit $1,000.00

January 13,1979 $4,422.26

Feb…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Budget Laundry Co. v. MUNTERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Williams v. Masters, Mates & Pilots of America, Local No. 2Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. Radcliffe On Delaware, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. Bethel Mart AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Tobash v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lokay v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Feingold v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. PerelleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. FlemingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. McFarlane v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API